Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 25.69%. Comparing base (b22acef) to head (3a2d701).

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (25.69%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #149      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   25.71%   25.69%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         104      104              
  Lines       12582    12595      +13     
==========================================
  Hits         3236     3236              
- Misses       9075     9088      +13     
  Partials      271      271              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I am not so familiar with mustache so I was not able to update the sdk-generator

Hi @FedotCompot - thanks for adding this.

We'll take a look Monday or sometime early next week.

Most likely we'll have to move these out to their own utility file as the way they're modified here is incompatible with the generation - but we'll have better feedback after a closer look.

Ping? 👉👈😅

👋🏻 Sorry for the delay @FedotCompot, as Raghd mentioned the model_*.go files are unfortunately autogenerated which means that it's not feasible to add model specific code like this into them.

I think what we'd be best doing is adding a new file alongside these that holds things like this, we have https://github.com/openfga/go-sdk/blob/b22acefa83636a9465c4a0c6734a4a31b5cd8e1f/utils.go but I'm not sure if that's the right place. Maybe a model_helpers.go file would suit?

I think utils.go is fine, it already adds methods to other types, and the functions I've added are classifiable as helper/utils